Monday, October 21, 2019

Hiring Mistakes: Five Stories About Job Failure

The key advantages of the company were, are and will be people. The employees who create and improve the product, attract customers, provide high service and process efficiency. Often, a stellar team that leaves a business observes its attenuation. Therefore, managers who are able to correctly assess the potential of the candidate provide a competitive advantage for the company.

Of course, no one is safe from hiring mistakes: both companies and candidates suffer equally from them. In time to notice them and not repeat the next time - it’s worth a lot. Let's look at the five key mistakes that managers face when hiring employees in a team. Also if you wanna be hr manager, do not do mistake in your cv and use literate resume writing service like this https://hrcareersearch.com/.

1. Role mismatch

Eugene came to the financial technology company as the head of the sales department. He successfully passed several interviews, showed excellent recommendations and even said that he was ready to invite four former employees to his team.

At the final meeting of the CEO, it was a little embarrassing that Eugene understood the product very superficially, but the manager decided to make a discount: "He will come to us and figure it out, nothing." Eugene worked for two months and was fired. It turned out that superficiality is his basic model of behavior, which concerned everything: from negotiating to managing a team. In a small company, where everything is in the palm of your hand, it turned out to be more difficult to hide than in a bank in which Eugene worked for five years.

2. Mismatch of values

It is good if the values ​​from the adaptation booklet of the company coincide with the affairs of its top managers. Anna, a successful marketer, took a very long time considering the offer of the "luxury company." And yet she accepted it. The tasks included: creating a marketing strategy, changing the website, introducing the company to Asian markets. After a couple of weeks, Anna began to feel aggression and tension from the CEO. “It will not work. I have been in this business for 20 years. Where did you get this analytics? I have a different feeling from the market. ”

The freedom of action promised at the start was replaced by the need to coordinate each proposal, each picture. A few weeks later, Anna was dismissed with the phrase "mismatch of values." Later, she found out that the director is very proud of her third marketing diploma, received in 1998, and that the company changes marketing experts every 3 months.

3. Inconsistency of qualifications

After a long search, Larisa (a journalist with more than five years of experience in the media) accepted the offer to become editor of a business magazine. Career growth seemed a logical continuation of her work: she was well-informed on the agenda, knew large businessmen in the city, and spent about three years working on the topic of economics and finance. One of its key tasks was the formation of a team of competent authors.

Not waiting for the end of the trial period, Larisa herself decided to leave the company. As it turned out, it was easier for her to write herself than to look for artists and help the authors figure out a new topic. For two and a half months, Larisa constantly worked overtime, filling the magazine with her own materials: she preferred to completely rewrite the proposed articles from journalists in her own way instead of handing it over for revision, indicating errors. Authors who would agree to work with the publication are almost gone. They didn’t hold Larisa: unfortunately, she could not cope with her task *.

4. Excess qualifications

Anton was very proud of his resume - work experience in foreign companies, foreign business trips within a group of companies, free English. But at 49, I had to look for work again, and it unexpectedly took a lot of time. Anton was not invited to the CFO role, and he accepted an offer for the position of deputy financial director.

A few months later, the company began to reduce - and Anton was offered to take the position of head of the treasury. A few weeks later in this role, Anton wrote a statement "on his own." Instead of preparing a company for an IPO, giving presentations to investors or participating in global strategy development, he has to check the calculations, prepare management reports and keep a payment calendar!

 5. Unavailability of a team or leader for changes

Victoria was invited to the game company for a total “reset” of HR processes. Victoria had three successfully implemented HR brand development projects, an MBA diploma and a strong HR team. The CEO promised full support in all initiatives. But it never came to them.

Following the results of two weeks of work, Victoria came with the results of an HR audit. The managerial competencies of managers are weak. Adaptation is not organized. Talented people leave the company, passive performers remain. No feedback. All decisions are made by the general and his deputy. “This is not at all what we discussed, let’s step up the selection,” the director said following the report. “We will not work together. Let's start looking for a new job, ”the deputy added more specifically.

 What do employers and job seekers do?

In order not to fall into the trap of erroneous hiring, it is important for employers:

- The correct job description. The temptation to attract the most talented people in the industry is great, but first answer your question: is it worth hammering nails with a microscope? For most tasks, you need professional performers with clear motivation and goals. Describe in detail the tasks and requirements for the role, what a person can learn and what his prospects are.
   
- Analyze failed hires. The concept of “error of survivors” is a type of systematic error of selection, when there is a lot of data for one group (“survivors”), and practically none for the other (“dead”). So the researchers are trying to look for common features among the "survivors" and lose sight of the fact that no less important information is hidden among the "dead". Understanding the reasons for unsuccessful hiring will allow you to eliminate this error at all stages of selection.
   
- To analyze the reasons for dismissals. In many companies, an exit interview is the only way to get feedback from an employee who will not embellish or avoid answering. In addition to the main demotivators, you can find out why the employee made this decision.
   
- Assess the relevance of the response and adjust the requirements or working conditions. A good rule: with each new search, do a job review with the manager. After all, a product, a business process, a market are changing. And the vacancy cannot be exactly the same as a year ago.
   
- Define the goals of the position and the criteria for achieving the goal. You will get clear markers if something goes wrong. And the employee will feel calmer and work better, clearly understanding what is expected of him.

No comments:

Post a Comment